On reviving a journal
A note on what it means to pick up a small journal of ethics after a pause, and on what we propose to do with it.
A journal is an argument in the form of a habit. To revive one is to accept both the argument and the discipline — to keep writing about what ethics requires of us in context, even when context keeps changing faster than we can read.
Continue reading →In this issue
Toward a Theory of Plural Business Purposes
[2023 C4eJ 16]Understanding Injustices Related to Mental Health Care: Sanism as a Key Concept
[2023 C4eJ 8]Hermeneutical Pluralism in Psychiatry: Lessons from the Spectrum 10K Controversy
[2023 C4eJ 7]Pathologizing Trans Identities: Emotional Marginalization and Mental Health
[2023 C4eJ 6]The Right to Have Rights in the Americas: Arendt, Mariátegui, and Monture in Dialogue (Conference: The Right to Have Rights Today)
[2022 C4eJ 36]On the Right to Abortion and “the Right to Have Rights” (Conference: The Right to Have Rights Today)
[2022 C4eJ 37]The Right to Have Rights: Humanity and Substantive Belonging (Conference: The Right to Have Rights Today)
[2022 C4eJ 38]From the archive
C4eJ — the Centre for Ethics Journal — publishes essays, symposia, and reviews written for readers who take moral and political questions seriously but do not want them wrapped in jargon. We believe that ethics is always in context — embedded in history, institutions, and the particular lives we are trying to live well together.
The Editors